|
|
ibvm ICE spokesman James Schwab quits, disputes claims 800 eluded arrest
Imoe Michelle Obama hosts final Kids State Dinner
The White House said Thursday that they would declare a national emergency in order to fund a barrier along the southern border. But the move is almost certain to invite challenges.President Trump has long claimed that there is a crisis at the border due to the high number of people seeking to cross into the U.S. though he does not differentiate between illegal immigrants and asylum seekers . And he has repeatedly threatened to bypass Congress and use emergency funds to build stanley drinking cup a wall, which was one of his core campaign promises during the 2016 election.Amid urging from some Congressional conservatives, the administration says it will move forward with an emergency declaration. The president is once again delivering on his promise to build the wall, protect the border, a stanley mugs nd secure our great country, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said Thursday. What is the National Emergencies Act Ironically, the National Emergencies Act of 1975 was intended to constrain the power of the presidency, to create a structure for the president to declare national emergencies in the post-Waterg stanley water bottle ate era. Under that law, the president can declare a national emergency, but must outline the specific emergency powers he is using under existing statutes. So Mr. Trump would have to justify his actions using acts already passed by Congress.Which statutes could Mr. Trump use to build the wall There are a few statutes which could allow the administration to Wvlf $2.2B infrastructure budget paves way for new roads, bridges, bike lanes across U.S.
An atheist who tried to remove under God from the Pledge of Allegiance lost a bid Friday to bar the saying of a Christian prayer at President Bush s inauguration.U.S. District Judge John Bates said Michael Newdow had no legal basis to pursue his claim because he could not show he would suffer any injury from hearing the prayer.Bates also ruled that Newdow s claim should be denied because he already had filed and lost a similar lawsuit at a federal appeals court in California last year. Newdow argued that saying a Christian prayer at the Jan. 20 ceremony would violate the Constitution by forcing him to accept unwanted religious beliefs.Attorneys representing Bush and his inaugural committee argued t stanley quencher hat prayers have been widely accepted at inaugurals for more than 200 years and that Bush s decision to have a minister re stanley water bottle cite the invocation was a personal choice the court had no power to prevent. During arguments in federal district court Thursday, attorneys representing Mr. Bush and his inaugural committee said Newdow s case should be dismissed because he already litigated and lost a similar lawsuit at a federal appeals court in California last year.The judge questioned both sides vigorously at a two-hour hearing but said he doubted a court could order the president not to include stanley cup a prayer when he takes the oath of office. Is it really in the public interest for the federal courts to step in and enjoin prayer at the president s ina |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
顯身卡
[信息未更新]